Consultation Report
•
Consultation & Follow-Up
Solution
Discoloration (Tantal Region)
Re-written Report
Fox in Burgen
From: Dr. Whyte (Dixmor)
Sent: Monday, May 14 6:56 PM
To: Dr. Pickman (Dixmor)
Subject: (no subject)
As per your request, an approximate schedule of events during the night of the Pickman Bridge malfunction in test case #412567:
7:54pm Fisto Sugar Manufactory Depot - Blackwell Island
Dr. Michael Grant was set up as decoy in ambush of subject. Blackwell Island chosen for remoteness, and along route of monthly fi. Ambush compromised by dexterity of subject. Dr. Grant subsequently. Subject escaped. Severe Project casualties.
9:32pm Maibatzu Plaza - City Center
Mr. Stanley Grex, the main source of funding for Pickman Bridge research, is assassinated in plain sight in middle of the plaza. Subject identified as assassin. Perimeter set up to allow no escape. Subject escaped. More Project casualties.
I cannot stress enough the importance of the subject's rehabilitation. If you want to be sure of how this happened, he must be treated as a psychiatric patient, not dissected as a lab animal. We must take responsibility for what we have created. -W
10:58pm Storage Facility C
Subject infiltrates covert Project storage facility adjacent to Watkins Trainyard. Watchdogs dispatched to retrieve subject. All hard files and discs pertaining to history of subject and data on Pickman Bridge destroyed in arson. Subject escaped. Watchdog casualties.
12:51am - Wooddale Community Enclave
Subject tracked to suburban neighborhood in residential sector. Situation integrity compromised - no longer confined to internal personnel. Local law enforcement and SWAT teams in area. Subject evades all and enters home of.
Report of Consultation
Opinion and Recommendation
Predator subjects with the test apparatus reported an 83% success rate in detecting the prey by the sound of his breathing. Predator subjects without test apparatus reported a 17% success rate at detection. Clearly the prey subject's breathing can be heard even without the apparatus to some extent.
Further Action
Significant difference between the 2 test groups were found - proceed with further testing of A453/9.
Suggested test would be to instruct the prey subject to hold his breath wherever one of the predator subjects is in close proximity (match the buttons that appear mainly on screen as an enemy appears into your safe zone). If he was successful at holding his breath, would the predators with test apparatus be able to hear his heartbeat?
Chart Copy